Best of Both Worlds

Green policies for job-creation AND sustainability

Dr Spencer Fitz-Gibbon

"We can confidently assert that Green policies could create an additional one million UK jobs during the first ten years of a Green industrial revolution."


- Contents -

Executive summary

Green policies could create a million UK jobs

Introduction

Jobs and sustainability

1. Greening Transport

Less traffic, less pollution - better public transport, more jobs

2. Greening Energy

Sustainable energy, less pollution, more jobs

3. Greening Agriculture

Less pollution, healthier food, more jobs, stronger rural economies

4. Greening Waste Management

Less pollution, safer environment, more jobs

5. Greening Industry Generally

Protect the environment, create jobs

Conclusion

The viable option for voters in June 2001


Executive summary

Green policies could create a million UK jobs

S1 The present economic system is not only unsustainable - it also contains a built-in job-destruction dynamic. Excessive emphasis on competition means businesses are constantly striving to cut costs - one of which is the bill for jobs. Technology is thus being used to cut costs and increase company profits, rather than for the general good of society.

S2 The creation of meaningful employment in benign industries is an essential part of the Green vision. This report indicates how jobs can be created in a way that also brings benefits for health and ecology.

S3 On Transport the report shows how Europe has lost 500,000 rail jobs in 20 years due to unsustainable policies favouring road haulage and road-building - and how spending on public transport creates more jobs than spending on roads.

S4 On Energy the report shows how 30,000 UK jobs in wind energy await creation over 10 years; how replacing conventional energy sources with wind power could TREBLE employment in the energy sector; how the less ecologically benign sectors of the energy industry sustain fewer jobs than the greener sectors, per unit of power produced; and how the UK's major businesses could cut energy costs by up to £1bn a year.

S5 On Agriculture, the report shows how unsustainable farming practices have cut farming jobs by two-thirds in 50 years - while devastating the environment. And how organic food production employs 20-30% more people per hectare than chemical- and mechanical-intensive farming. And how sustainable agricultural practices could quickly create 40,000 new jobs in the UK.

S6 On the related themes of Repair, Reuse, Recycling and Waste-Management, the report shows how industries associated with reuse and repair are known to sustain more jobs than their new-manufacture equivalent; how banning throwaway containers for beer and fizzy drinks would create up to 4,000 UK jobs; how cutting car manufacture could be combined with creating more jobs in the automotive industry; how recycling offers to create 14,000 extra jobs in London alone; and how greener forms of waste management sustain far more jobs per quantity of waste than either landfill or incineration - while also having environmental and health benefits.


Introduction

Jobs and sustainability

I1 The Green Party seeks a holistic approach to politics, in which all policy areas are integrated rather than played off against one another. This report challenges the myth that society must choose between health and environmental protection on the one hand, and the economic benefits of job-creation on the other.

I2 The Green Party believes that the sensible application of modern technology should ultimately allow society the freedom to do less work - but there is still clearly a lot of work to do in the development of a socially just and ecologically sustainable society.

I3 We cannot keep unsustainable and unhealthy industries going just for the sake of 'jobs'. On the other hand, we don't need to suffer the kind of deprivation which has met the decline of successive industries during this century. Green policy seeks to steer the economy towards an improvement of quality of life for society as a whole, meaningful paid employment for those who seek it, and a fairer share of both the wealth and the work. This report focuses on the Green job-creation part of the equation.

I4 There are demonstrably Green policy areas with major job-increase potential. There are ecologically destructive sectors with relatively low job-sustaining performance. This report highlights some areas where pursuit of ecologically sustainable economics, including investment in Green 'sunrise' sectors, would have clear job-creation benefits.

I5 Each section of this report gives brief statements of Green Party policy.


1. Greening Transport

Less traffic, less pollution - better public transport, more jobs

1.1 The EU's railways have lost 500,000 jobs in 20 years (European Information Service). The first 10 years of Margaret Thatcher's government saw 70,000 railway jobs disappear in the UK (Road to the Future, Green Party 1991, p3.)

1.2 The growth of road haulage has clearly paralleled a decline in other more sustainable freight modes. And the rise of the 'car economy' has paralleled the decline of public transport. Combined, they have been one of the greatest causes of ecological degradation this century. Transport pollution directly and indirectly accounts for about half of global warming and is a major cause of premature death and of a variety of illnesses.

1.3 A comprehensive policy for a sustainable transport system is found in the Green Party's Manifesto for a Sustainable Society. This report indicates simply that the development of a sustainable transport sector is compatible with a healthy employment policy.

1.4 A recent study by the German Road League found that spending on public transport would yield far more job-years than spending on roads. An outlay of DM100 million would yield:

1,201-1,630 person-years of work if spent on roads

1,880 person-years of work if spent on rail construction

1,992 person-years of work if spent on local public transport such as light rail construction

1.5 These figures are supported by a Cambridge Econometrics study in 1992 which showed that jobs in road-building projects cost far more to sustain that jobs in other, more sustainable sectors, including major public transport projects.

Project

Cost per job (£)

Energy efficiency

8,750-17,500

Building 100,000 new homes

20,000-40,000

East London Line

34,000

Northern Line Refurbishment

34,000

Midland Main-line Electrification

34,000

West Coast Mainline Upgrade

35,000

Jubilee Line Extension

50,000

New Forth Road Bridge

65,000

East Coast Motorway

66,000

M6 Widening

66,000

M1 Widening

67,000

East London River Crossing (Road)

68,000

M25 Widening

78,000

(Source: Sunday Times 25.10.92.)

1.6 Friends of the Earth UK have produced a study entitled Less Traffic, More Jobs exploring this issue in depth and demonstrating conclusively that Green policies are advantageous in economic as well as ecological terms.

1.7 Further evidence along these lines is found in North West Green Party's report about the unsustainable and resource-intensive air transport industry, Pigs Might Fly: A Green economic critique of Manchester airport's expansion. This report argues comprehensively that aviation, being so resource-intensive, spends a high proportion of its turnover on burning oil and importing expensive technology, and a relatively low proportion on employing people. Moreover the industry represents a net drain on the UK balance of payments, in the order of £4bn a year.

1.8 Clearly it is in society's interests for job-creation as well as health and ecological reasons to switch resources from road haulage and car-dominated transport to the less resource-intensive modes.

Policy initiatives

1. Major switch away from road-building to the development of an ecologically sustainable transport network emphasising:

a. Public transport.

b. Less fuel-intensive transport modes.

c. Localisation of economies, to minimise routine transportation.

2. Promotion of a fuel policy to achieve this, combined with policies for economic well-being (see Greening Industry Generally below).


2. Greening Energy

Sustainable energy, less pollution, more jobs

2.1 It is now widely recognised that the burning of fossil fuels has brought the world to the brink of global ecological catastrophe. A major factor is domestic and industrial energy demand. There is now the technology and the experience to reduce this demand and meet society's requirements in a manner that reduces ecological degradation, promotes better health, cuts both people's fuel bills and industry's energy costs, and creates more jobs than unsustainable energy can.

2.2 The European Commission has calculated that doubling the amount of renewables in Europe would create 500,000 to 900,000 new jobs (see New Power for Britain, Greenpeace UK; Positive News, Winter 1998).

2.3 A study by Environmental Resources Ltd for the Association for the Conservation of Energy found that a 10-year programme to cut domestic energy use would create 500,000 person-years of work (see Working Futures p54.)

2.4 Studies by the American Wind Energy Association suggest that replacing conventional energy sources with wind power could increase employment in the energy sector by 198-396% (see Working Futures p59).

2.5 A study by Friends of the Earth UK argued that energy efficiency investments in the UK could create an additional 81,000 direct and indirect jobs (Working Futures p63.)

2.6 A recent report by Sustainable Development Ltd for Greenpeace UK shows that providing just 10% of UK electricity from offshore wind would generate 30,000 new jobs. (Offshore Wind, Onshore Jobs: A new world class British energy industry for the millennium.)

2.7 The less ecologically benign sectors of the energy industry sustain fewer jobs than the greener sectors, per unit of power produced. Nuclear power - which produces the ultimate form of pollution and is implicated in growing rates of cancer - sustains a little over one-sixth of the jobs sustained by wind energy for a given output of power. Wind energy is four times better than coal energy for sustaining jobs. (See Working Futures p61.)

2.8 Even closing down the nuclear power industry completely will not mean destroying all jobs in the industry. Such is the nature of nuclear waste, that this industry will continue to sustain jobs in large numbers for many thousands of years after it has ceased producing electricity. Decommissioning nuclear power stations is set to become a growth industry in its own right. Companies like BNFL could seize this opportunity and begin exporting decommissioning expertise and technology to other countries.

2.9 Energy saving policies, of course, also help cut business costs, which in turn helps protect jobs. UK food processors Heinz recently installed a combined heat and power (CHP) station for one of their plants, which they estimated would save almost £500,000 a year and cut their CO2 emissions by 30,000 tonnes a year. The manufacturers estimated that the UK's CHP industry could save British industry £1 billion a year in energy costs and cut 15 million tonnes of CO2 emissions a year. (Source: Heinz.)

Policy initiatives

1. Close down the nuclear power industry. Replace its jobs with a larger number in the sustainable energy production sector, as well as preserving those of the nuclear decommissioning and waste management sector.

2. Comprehensive programme of demand-side management (DSM) to cut people's fuel bills and reduce demand for energy.

3. Incentives to industry to reduce its energy use (including rising fuel taxes).

4. Rapid development of non-nuclear renewables to meet Europe's energy needs.


3. Greening Agriculture

Less pollution, healthier food, more jobs, stronger rural economies

3.1 Between 1945 and 1992, the total number of jobs on English farms fell from 478,000 to 135,000. (MAFF census figures, in Working Futures p73). This has had a knock-on effect in job-destruction as rural populations have fallen and local services been closed down. The same process has destroyed 95% of our wildflower meadows, 30-50% of our ancient woodlands, 50-60% of lowland heathland, 140,000 miles of hedgerows and over half our lowland fens, valley and basin mires (Working Futures p74) - while pollution associated with food transport has drastically increased, and the UK still imports half of its food!

3.2 Green policies tackle this dire situation in a comprehensive way - with powerful implications for job-creation.

3.3 Organic food production employs 20-30% more people per hectare than chemical- and mechanical-intensive farming. German and Swedish experience suggests that Britain could be '10% organic' within 10 years, and that this would create 12,000-18,000 more jobs. A more determined effort achieving a 25% target would create 30,000-45,000 additional jobs. (See Working Futures pp75-76.) The benefits to rural communities would be very significant.

3.4 Greener use of woodlands would also sustain more jobs. Managing semi-natural woodland creates three times as many jobs as introducing conifer plantations (see Working Futures p77). Replacing UK imports of tropical hardwoods with home-grown timber - creating up to 590,000 hectares of broad-leaved woodland - would create 3,300-4,400 jobs (Working Futures p77), be a major carbon sink, and create tremendous wildlife benefits - and be a major step towards the stabilising of Britain's economy through localisation (production for local need as locally as possible, which in turn reduces transport and pollution impacts).

3.5 A report by the Sustainable Agriculture, Food & Environment Alliance (Vicky Hird, 1997) estimates that sustainable agricultural practices could create 40,000 new jobs in the UK.

3.6 Reducing 'food miles' - the distance which food had travelled, which is facilitated by cheap fuel - would strengthen local production for local need, helping to stabilise markets, and allowing UK farmers to meet a growing demand for locally-grown produce. Cheap fuel also facilitates the economies of scale which destroy jobs.

Policy initiatives

1. Promote the complete reform of the Common Agricultural Policy to release funds for sustainable food production, including £500m for agri-environment schemes by 2005.

2. An organic Targets Act to ensure 30% of UK food is organic by 2010, and pesticide use is cut by 50% by 2005.

3. Development of the UK timber industry to meet the growing timber needs of a sustainable society, while eventually replacing timber imports.

3. Fuel policies to reduce 'food miles'.


4. Greening Waste Management

Less pollution, safer environment, more jobs

4.1 The development of a 'throwaway' society has generated enormous problems - and costs - related to handling colossal quantities of waste (one of the externalised or hidden costs of the industries concerned, which are passed indirectly to the consumer). At the same time it has destroyed jobs which once existed in industries associated with reuse and repair. Moreover, the latter are known to sustain more jobs than the new-manufacture equivalent.

4.2 Banning throwaway containers for beer and fizzy drinks in the UK would create up to 4,000 new jobs within 3 years (Working Futures p66).

4.3 Reconditioning a 10-year-old car to make it last another 10 years leads to an energy saving of 42% but a 56% increase in labour-time compared to manufacturing a new car (Working Futures p66). This implies that the number of cars being manufactured could be drastically cut while still increasing the number of jobs in the industry.

4.4 Increasing the collection rate for paper recycling alone from 30% to 75% (the Netherlands rate) would create up to 4,500 jobs in recycling. (Working Futures p67.)

4.5 A report by LPAC/Environment Agency shows that recycling in London alone offers to create 14,000 extra jobs in the next decade - bringing processing industry back into the city and making a major contribution to tackling the waste problems on London's estates and streets. (Reinventing Waste: Towards a London Waste Strategy, August 1998.)

4.6 Dealing with waste in greener ways sustains more jobs than dealing with it in less sustainable ways. In New York it was found that processing 1 million tons of waste sustained:

40-60 jobs if the waste was landfilled

100-290 jobs if the waste was incinerated

200-300 jobs through mixed solid waste composting

400-590 jobs if the waste was recycled

4.7 In Vermont, where economies of scale were less (probably more likenable to the average UK scenario), it was found that processing 1 million tons of waste sustained:

50-360 jobs if the waste was landfilled

550-2,000 jobs if the waste was recycled

(Working Futures pp68-69)

Policy initiatives

1. Comprehensive eco-taxation to deter pollution and dependency on finite resources.

2. Pump-priming investment for sectors involved with reuse, repair, recycling and waste reduction.


5. Greening Industry Generally

Protect the environment, create jobs

5.1 A recent report by Energy for Sustainable Development Ltd shows how, for an investment of £2.2 billion a year, up to half a million UK jobs could be created by a range of policies calculated to cut CO2 emissions by 30% by 2010. A smaller investment of £0.75 billion a year could create 230,000 jobs and cut CO2 by 20%. (Cutting CO2 - Creating Jobs: An economic analysis of policies to cut UK CO2 emissions by 20% or more, ESD for Friends of the Earth, 1998.)

5.2 Cambridge Econometrics have found that applying the 'Polluter Pays' principle would create 200,000 jobs in the pollution control industry. They also found that a major investment programme to improve water quality could create 696,000 extra jobs. (A Green Scenario for the UK economy.)

5.3 Even a Labour Party report in 1994 found that 'higher environmental standards' could generate 682,000 jobs, allowing for a carbon tax and various investments (In Trust for Tomorrow, Labour Party Policy Commission on the Environment.) Unfortunately the Labour Party has consistently opted for similar policies to the previous Conservative government, and has taken only tentative steps towards greening the economy.

5.4 Capital- and resource-intensive industries create fewer jobs per £x of turnover. A study from Alberta, Canada shows how the relatively resource-intensive (ungreen) industries create relatively few jobs compared to the less resource-intensive sectors. This study found that for each CAN$1m of capital expenditure:

The oil and gas industry generated 1.4 jobs

The manufacturing sector generated 9.2 jobs

The agriculture sector generated 13 jobs

The services sector generated 32 jobs

(See Flavin and Lenssen, Beyond the Petroleum Age: Designing a Solar Economy, Worldwatch Institute, Washington DC, 1990.)

5.5 As has been seen in other sections, we can take this further by showing that greener ways of operating within a given sector tend to create more jobs than relatively ungreen ways of working.

5.6 Manchester Green Party made similar findings to the Alberta study when considering the job-sustaining record of (local authority-owned) Manchester Airport plc with other local authority sectors. In Cloud Cuckoo Land: The sad truth about jobs and Runway 2, various local authority sectors' annual expenditure was compared with the number of people it employed:

Department

Cost per job (£)

Housing and environmental services

2,256

Children's services

20,022

Environmental planning

20,635

Leisure management

23,731

Social services

24,203

Galleries and museums

26,217

Libraries and theatres

26,315

Education

26,913

Highways and cleansing

44,053

Manchester Airport plc

76,464

5.7 It is clear that just as there are greener ways of operating which sustain more jobs, so there are sectors of the economy which are trumpeted as major creators of jobs which, in fact, have a relatively poor job-creation record considering the vast amounts of wealth they turn over.

5.8 Green taxation policies offer the principal key to ecologically-sustainable job-creation. The Employment Policy Institute has published a report saying that nearly 500,000 jobs could be created if 'eco-taxes' replaced employers' National Insurance contributions. (Planet News, 1995. See also Guardian 18.10.95.)

5.9 Friends of the Earth UK has recently gone further, and estimated that an increased escalatory tax on road fuel of 17.6% per annum from 1996 could increase employment by 1.275m by 2005, if the revenue from the tax was recycled through a decrease in employers' National Insurance contributions. (See Working Futures pp84-85.) As the cost of supporting one person on benefit for a year is probably about £10,000 (it was £9,000 in 1994 according to an Employment Policy Institute paper - D Piachaud, 'A Price Worth Paying?'), then this combined job-creation/environmental protection effort could be saving the treasury some £12.75 billion a year by 2005.

5.10 On this basis - and in the light of all the other evidence presented in this report - it can be confidently asserted, as a conservative estimate, that Green policies could create an additional one million UK jobs during a10-year period of Green industrial revolution.


Conclusion

The viable option for voters in June 2001

C1 Public opinion has gradually fallen in with Green Party policy on a range of issues from road-building and traffic reduction to genetically-modified foods and organic agriculture. There is every reason to suppose that the public would heartily approve of Green job-creation policies. And we know from the above that these policies are viable.

C2 Society can choose: an economic system which is ecologically unsustainable and which contains a built-in job-destruction dynamic; or a society which is both sustainable and fair, in which job-creation and sustainability go hand-in-hand.

C3 In June 2001 the UK electorate will have the opportunity to vote for sustainability AND jobs. We hope our message gets through.


Acknowledgments

Thanks to the following for their assistance with the preparation of this report: the Association for the Conservation of Energy, the European Information Service, Friends of the Earth UK, Greenpeace UK, Sustain (the Food and Farming Alliance), Transport 2000.


Dr Spencer Fitz-Gibbon

Green Party of England & Wales
1a Waterlow Road, London N19 5NJ
020 7561 0282
media@greenparty.org,uk